Answers on scope, delivery, pricing, and working model.

Logic Grid Studio is an integrated operating partner across software development, AI and automation, discoverability (SEO, ASO, GEO), and growth systems. Rather than working as a specialist agency in one lane, we own the full delivery chain from architecture through execution—so strategy, build, and visibility stay coordinated under a single accountable partner. Engagements range from a scoped product build to an ongoing operating relationship spanning multiple systems.

Good fits typically involve: a product or platform that needs senior-level architecture and delivery ownership; an AI or automation initiative that requires design, integration, and responsible roll-out; a discoverability program (technical SEO, GEO, ASO) that needs to be built as a system rather than a one-off campaign; or a growth challenge where measurement, funnel logic, and content need to be engineered together. We work best when the problem requires integrated thinking across disciplines, not a single isolated deliverable.

Most engagements start with a scope review conversation—typically 30 to 45 minutes. We cover your current situation, goals, constraints, and the specific outcome you need. From there we produce a structured scope document that defines the work, delivery model, timeline, and commercial framing. The scope review is a working conversation, not a sales pitch. You leave with clarity regardless of whether an engagement follows.

After the scope review we provide a written scope document within one to three business days. This covers: the defined deliverable or operating scope, the recommended delivery model (project-based, sprint-based, or growth team), the timeline and milestone structure, and the commercial terms. If adjustments are needed, we iterate on the scope before any commitment is made. Work begins only when scope, timeline, and commercial terms are aligned and agreed in writing.

We operate across three delivery models depending on scope and continuity needs. Project-based delivery is used for clearly scoped outcomes with defined endpoints—architecture work, product builds, SEO infrastructure programs, or AI pilot deployments. Sprint-based delivery is used for iterative development, evolving product scopes, or phased roadmap execution. Growth team delivery is used for engagements requiring ongoing operating partnership across software, discoverability, and growth—with a dedicated capacity and shared operating cadence. The model is selected during scope review based on your actual situation, not a default.

Timelines depend on scope and delivery model. A focused technical SEO infrastructure program typically runs 6 to 10 weeks. A product discovery and architecture phase runs 4 to 6 weeks. A custom platform build or AI integration runs 8 to 20 weeks depending on complexity. An ASO system launch runs 4 to 8 weeks. Sprint-based and growth team engagements run on recurring cycles with defined sprint lengths and quarterly review rhythms. Every engagement receives a milestone plan before work begins—no commitments without a timeline in writing.

We price by delivery model. Project-based scopes use fixed-fee pricing tied to defined milestones—no ambiguity around scope creep or billing surprises. Sprint-based engagements use a fixed sprint rate with a defined sprint capacity. Growth team engagements use a monthly retainer structure with a defined operating scope and capacity commitment. Pricing reflects senior-level delivery: architecture decisions, system design, and accountable delivery ownership—not junior team output managed at a distance. Detailed commercial framing is available on the Pricing page, and specific figures are confirmed during the scope review.

We work in English, Turkish, and Spanish across software delivery, content systems, SEO, and discoverability programs. For multilingual SEO and GEO engagements, we build content and technical architecture capable of reaching English-language global markets, Turkish-language MENA and domestic markets, and Spanish-language LatAm and European markets. Our team operates natively across these language environments—transcreation and locale-specific technical SEO are first-class capabilities, not add-ons.

We work with organisations at different stages—but the profile that benefits most from how we operate is a company with a defined product or growth challenge that requires senior-level delivery, not a team running commodity execution. That includes growth-stage startups building their first scalable platform, mid-market companies modernising a legacy system or launching a new product line, and enterprise teams needing a capable external partner for a specific initiative with strategic stakes. The engagement model adjusts to context; the delivery standard does not.

For project-based engagements, a structured handover and a defined stabilisation period is included in every scope. We do not hand over and disappear. For clients with ongoing operating needs, a maintenance and continuity SLA is available as a separate service covering monitoring, updates, incident response, and proactive health reviews. For growth team engagements, continuity is built into the model—there is no defined endpoint unless you need one.

Clients work with a single accountable point of contact throughout the engagement—not a rotating account team. Status updates follow an agreed cadence (weekly written summary and milestone reviews at defined intervals). We work asynchronously across time zones with structured check-ins rather than continuous-availability expectations. All deliverables are documented, version-controlled, and handed over with context. We expect clients to be actively available for decisions, not continuously involved in execution—that is our responsibility.

A scope review is the right next step if you have a challenge or outcome in mind but are not yet certain of the right delivery approach, team structure, or commercial model. It is not a sales call—it is a structured working conversation. We ask about your situation, you ask about our approach, and we both leave with a clearer picture of whether and how we should work together. There is no obligation. If the scope review does not surface a clear fit, we will say so plainly.